Ib Extended Essay Mark Band

Monday, February 14, 2022 5:24:11 AM

Ib Extended Essay Mark Band



The highest mark a student can earn is 45 points…. Group 5: Mathematics. Print versions of all Essay questions on new labour these documents can be found in your EE Handbook, and electronic versions at the top right hand Which days of the week did some of the popular holidays fall on in 2014? The story of an hour and the yellow wallpaper essay this page follow links. Display as a link instead. Which days of the week did some of the popular holidays fall on in 2014?, don't forget that your What animals live in the temperate forests? assessment is part of your overall EE score. They What animals live in the temperate forests? merely intended to support students through the process. Search the Library Catalogue.

How to do research for your IB Extended Essay, by an EE examiner.

Generally, what structure you follow depends entirely on your question, but there are several models you can follow when outlining your extended essay:. Summarise each paragraph into one line that defines the idea or sub-topic behind it. Expand each paragraph summary by adding 2 extra bullet points:. How the example relates to the idea you are trying to convey.

Expand your paragraph bullet points by adding in other ideas or points that are directly relevant to the overall idea behind it. Put all the points you want to discuss onto post-it notes. You can proceed by grouping them under different categories, ideas, and themes. Reshuffle the notes until you have found the best outline. This outline helps you make sure that you cover all your bases and that you follow a logical structure. Almost all students always end up with more words than they should! Check out our site for more information about personalised IB Extended Essay support. With a good tutor, the Extended Essay can be an extremely rewarding and constructive experience.

You may find us at or enquiries bartyed. What literary devices may be significant to discuss? Why did the author sit down to write this book at all? Structure is everything. Generally, what structure you follow depends entirely on your question, but there are several models you can follow when outlining your extended essay: Bullet Point Outline Summarise each paragraph into one line that defines the idea or sub-topic behind it. Expand each paragraph summary by adding 2 extra bullet points: Evidence, data, or a quote. Post-it Note Outline Put all the points you want to discuss onto post-it notes.

You do not talk about different interpretations of the topic. Answers show little or no evidence of structure and consist of little more than unsupported generalizations. There is little or no understanding of historical context of historical processes. While there may be recognizable essay structure, answers consist of little more than poorly substantiated assertions. IB 3 You have kind of understood the question, but not really. You use hardly any historical facts. Barely any reference to interpretations of the topic. Badly structured. There is some accurate historical knowledge, but detail is insufficient. Understanding of historical processes and where appropriate comparison and contrast may be present, but underdeveloped.

While there may be a recognizable essay structure, the question is only partially addressed. IB 4 You show a general, but very basic understanding of the question. There is an argument, but it is not well supported by historical evidence facts OR it is a narrative description of the events with accurate facts but no analysis you do not show HOW this answers the question.

Relevant in-depth historical knowledge is present but is unevenly applied throughout. Answers are presented in a narrative or descriptive manner. Alternatively, there is a limited argument that requires further substantiation. Some attempt at analysis may be present but limited. There has been some attempt to place events in their historical context and to show an understanding of historical processes and where appropriate comparison and contrast.

There is evidence of an attempt to follow a structured approach, either chronological or thematic. IB 5 You understand the question, but there are some ways of looking at it that you have left out. You did place events in their historical context showing what was going on at the time. You use accurate and relevant facts to support your points. Chronology is accurate as shown by cause and effect relationships. There is a thematic structure it is split into factors or, if it is chronological, then there is clean analysis of each event.

All criteria must be met. Relevant, largely accurate in-depth historical knowledge is present and applied as evidence. Critical commentary analysis indicates some understanding. Events are placed in their historical context. There is an understanding of historical processes and where appropriate comparison and contrast. There may be some awareness of different approaches to, and interpretations of historical issues and events. However, responses that mainly summarize the views of historians and use these as a substitute for, rather than a supplement to, the deployment of historical knowledge can not reach the top of this band.

There is a clear attempt to structure answers chronology or thematically. Synthesis is present but underdeveloped. Relevant, in-depth historical knowledge is applied as evidence. Critical commentary analysis indicates some understanding, but it is not consistent throughout. There is a sound understanding of historical processes and where appropriate comparison and contrast. There may be awareness and some evaluation of different approaches to, and interpretations of historical issues and events. These are used to supplement, in a relevant manner, the arguments presented. IB 6 You show a good understanding of the question.

Your essay has clear structure which really helps you answer it. The argument is well-developed and well supported by the BEST facts, many details, and accurate chronology to prove your point. Different interpretations of the topic are considered and, where relevant, placed in their historical context. All underlined criteria must be met. Where appropriate, answers may challenge the assumptions in the question successfully. In-depth and accurate historical knowledge is applied consistently and convincingly to support analysis. There is a clear understanding of historical processes and where appropriate comparison and contrast. There may be evaluation of different approaches to, and interpretations of historical issues and events.

This evaluation is integrated effectively into the answer to support and supplement the argument. Answers are well-structured and clearly expressed, using evidence to support relevant, balanced, and focused arguments. Synthesis is well-developed, with knowledge and analysis fully and effectively integrated. IB 7 Meets all the above criteria for a 6, but everything is done to a really high level. You also need to do one or more of the following: Marks: Show a high level of conceptual ability, possibly by challenging the assumptions implied in the question using evidence. Show awareness of the reasons why there are differing and contrasting historical interpretations, going beyond identifying those interpretations and historians.

Fully and effectively combine knowledge and analysis highly developed synthesis. Edited August 8, by emyski. Link to post Share on other sites. Posted August 8, Arrowhead 1, Posted August 8, Posted August 9, Posted August 15, That markscheme is not right Posted December 6,

The mark Essay on the tennis court oath should be the one which most fairly shows the balance between achievement and mark band. Economics May Report abuse. Nicolai Nielsen 23 What do you put on a fax cover sheet?