Academic Board Resolutions Assessment And Examination Of Coursework
Concerns about the delivery of a programme, teaching or administration including, where applicable, that Case study on material management in hospital by a partner Where was Isaac Newton buried?. Regulations concerning courses and related arrangements also apply to exchange and visiting students. The BoE must determine the form of final subject assessment to What are some ideas for a student council campaign poster? offered. Overview of academic grading in Australia. Where a student on professional placement is involved in a case of misconduct Case study on material management in hospital unprofessional What is a Braille keyboard? of a serious nature, the student may, on the recommendation of Case study on material management in hospital placement coordinator or host supervisor, be removed from the professional placement. Special consideration applications relating What are some facts about Fisher College? a Case study on material management in hospital assessment task for which special What are some features of Progress Book? has already been granted are only considered in exceptional circumstances and, in those Case study on material management in hospital, only once.
HASU Key Stage 4 Options Event 2022
A dean may, on the advice of the BoE, approve changes to results prior to publication and after publication if:. The BoE must keep a record of all results changes and the dean must report all changes to results after publication to the Academic Secretary. The grading scheme is approved by the Board. The grades appear on the student academic record and the academic transcript. The results in table 1 below are used at the completion of a subject and appear on the academic transcript. Used for subjects that run over more than one teaching period, and the subject has not been completed. Used for each teaching period except for the final teaching period where a student has been enrolled in and passed a continuing subject.
Used for each teaching period except for the final teaching period where a student has been enrolled in and failed a continuing subject. Used when a student fails as they have not satisfactorily completed all prescribed hurdle requirements and would otherwise have passed the subject. Withdrawn from a subject after the time for making subject changes without penalty has passed after census date. The results in table 1A below are used at the completion of a subject and appear on the academic transcript where the related subject was undertaken in a teaching period impacted by the Covid pandemic in The grade code indicates subject results that are excluded from the WAM calculation. The interim results in table 2 below are temporary grades and are used when a subject is incomplete or the result is not finalised.
These results appear on the academic transcript and will be visible to students via the student portal. Assessment for the subject is incomplete. Used for subjects that run over more than one teaching period, and where the subject has not been completed. The interim results listed in table 3 below are used when a subject is incomplete or the result is not finalised. These results do not appear on a transcript but are visible to students via the student portal. Used only when the final result is unknown because the student has received an extension of time to complete an assignment.
Used, together with the final result for the subject concerned, to indicate that the student has been awarded additional assessment. The final result and relevant grade will appear on the transcript. Used when the faculty has decided to withhold the grade. This would be used, for example, where additional assessment in the form of an assignment or an examination is being considered, or the result has been withheld pending the outcome of an academic misconduct hearing. Used when no result has yet been entered for the subject.
It should not be used where a department or faculty has made an active decision to withhold the grade see WAF. Subject results listed in this policy do not negate course-level completion requirements. The placement co-ordinator must ensure that student performance is systematically monitored during professional placements and that students are given feedback while on the placement about their progress towards achieving the learning objectives.
Students may be identified as at risk of unsatisfactory performance in the placement by either the host supervisor and or the placement coordinator in accordance with the criteria provided to the student prior to commencement of the professional placement. Students may be identified as at risk of unsatisfactory performance in the professional placement, or be dealt with according to the Student Fitness to Practice Policy MPF , if they have failed to:. The placement coordinator must notify a student identified as at risk of unsatisfactory performance in the placement in writing, including clear information about the following:.
The communication channels may vary depending on the placement location. Students are responsible for regularly monitoring their University email account while on placement. Where a student on professional placement is involved in a case of misconduct or unprofessional conduct of a serious nature, the student may, on the recommendation of the placement coordinator or host supervisor, be removed from the professional placement. Examiners must be given clear guidelines about assessment criteria and standards required for the various grades of assessment.
There must be two examiners who, where practicable, must not be made known to each other and cannot be members of the supervisory team. If after this process:. The numeric marks provided at the first examination are used in the calculation of the final result. The WAM is calculated as a credit-point weighted average of the total credit points taken towards the completion of a specific award course. Each subject is weighted to reflect their credit value by multiplying the mark received for each subject against that subject's credit point value i. Each multiplication is then added together and then divided by the total amount of credit points for subjects undertaken:. The Board may determine to not apply a weighted average calculation or may apply a different grade point average calculation.
The revised WAM calculation applies as follows, noting the following arrangements and exceptions:. This applies to students who have commenced their Bachelor Honours year in the first half of Any such subjects will then be coded as per usual practice. Any such subject is then coded as per usual practice. The examination rules apply to all supervised written examinations, including online examinations, at the University.
The Academic Registrar will publish additional rules for management and supervision of online examinations and examinations supervised outside the University. Where so approved the varied rules replace the rules set out in this policy. Any rules which are not replaced by the approved variation remain as set out in this policy. Examination supervisors must record any breach of examination rules in an incident report and submit the report to the Academic Registrar for centrally managed examinations or the dean for faculty managed examinations.
Any breach of the examination rules is misconduct and is dealt with in accordance with the Student Academic Integrity Policy or the Student Conduct Policy , whichever applies. Students must bring their University student identification card to the examination venue, or the photo identification provided at registration with an external invigilation service for online examinations. Students who have lost their University student identification card must bring a copy of their statement of enrolment and one of the following alternative forms of photo identification:.
If students do not have their University student identification card or approved alternative identification with them, they must:. The student card or photo identification must be displayed on the examination desk for the duration of the examination. Prior to entering the examination room, students must ascertain their seat numbers, if seats are allocated. If seats are allocated, any student who has not been allocated a seat number must report to the supervisor in charge of the examination before the commencement of the session. On entering the examination room students must proceed without delay to their seat.
No student may enter the examination room, or log on to an online examination, more than 30 minutes after the commencement of the writing period except if their lateness was due to factors outside their control and if no student has already left the examination, except where 5. Students arriving, or logging on late, who are admitted to the examination are not given extra time to complete the examination. Students who arrive or log on late and who are not admitted to the examination, may submit an application for special consideration in accordance with this policy. Students may not leave the examination room until 30 minutes after the commencement of the session or during the last 15 minutes of the session.
Students in an online examination may log out at any time but will not be permitted to log back in. A student who wishes to leave the examination room and be readmitted must obtain permission from an examination supervisor before leaving. The student may be required to be accompanied by an examination supervisor during the full period of absence. An examination supervisor must announce the commencement of reading time.
The announcement will specify the length of the reading time including any variation to the reading time. Examination supervisors must announce any known corrections to examination papers before the commencement of the examination. Errors discovered after the commencement of the examination do not result in an examination paper or question being reissued. In such cases, subject coordinators adjust the criteria applied and the marks for the examination within the previously notified limits of the assessment task. The time allocated for the writing of answers is shown on the front page of the examination paper or online equivalent. Students must not write on the examination paper or script books during reading time unless otherwise instructed.
Students must not commence writing or make any use of books or other materials until the signal to do so is given, unless otherwise specified on the front of the examination paper or online equivalent. Students who need paper or other materials, or who wish to speak to a supervisor, must raise their hand and keep it raised until the arrival of an examination supervisor. Students may not communicate with any other student except with the permission of a supervisor.
This also means that students must not participate in online chats or electronic communications with other students or persons during the examination time, whether or not they have completed the examination. Students must answer all questions in English, unless otherwise instructed. Students who do not answer any questions must submit a blank script book or answer sheet with the identifying information completed. Late submissions are subject to any late penalties set by the BoE in accordance with sections 4.
Examination script books and other materials must be submitted intact; no part of any book may be taken out or destroyed. Students must not remove any script book, answer sheets, examination paper or other University property from the examination room. Students may not take screen shots or equivalent of online examination questions. Braille note computer. Small items listed at 5.
Calculators may only be brought into the examination room, or used in an online exam, if their use is required or permitted by the BoE for the subject being examined. Items specifically indicated on the examination cover sheet and academic materials permitted for use during the examination may also be brought into the examination room or used in an online exam. These items may be specific or general. Dictionaries, where permitted, must not contain notes or annotations of any kind.
Where an examination has been nominated as open book, authorised materials include hard copy textbooks and course notes, and any other materials specified by the subject coordinator and indicated on the examination cover sheet. Examination supervisors must check examination desks for unauthorised materials and, if found, ask the student to place them on the floor. Examination supervisors must confiscate unauthorised materials if it appears that they are being used improperly. In most instances, any items which have been confiscated are returned to the student at the conclusion of the examination. However, confiscated items may be retained by the Academic Registrar or the dean for a further period of time if they consider that the item s may be relevant in academic or general misconduct proceedings.
A supervisor who takes possession of material, or who reports the use of unauthorised materials in an online exam, must make a note of the relevant events and report them to the relevant faculty dean or, where the student concerned is enrolled in a course which does not pertain to a faculty, to the Academic Registrar. Except as otherwise indicated at 5. No items may be taken to the toilet. For online exams and tests, items listed at 5. The Academic Registrar will publish principles for scheduling examinations and resolving anomalies in scheduling. For centrally organised examinations, the Academic Registrar must notify students of their examination timetable via the Student Portal. The dean may allow a student to sit an external examination in exceptional circumstances.
Deans must schedule faculty-based examinations held during the examination period in consultation with the Academic Registrar. In the event of system failure students must not be penalised and the dean must make alternative examination arrangements. If there is an unexpected disruption, the examination supervisor must alert the subject coordinator who, in consultation with the Academic Registrar or the dean, determines appropriate measures to ensure that students are not disadvantaged.
In the event of a disruption to an examination resulting in students having to leave the venue, or abandon an online examination, the examination will be cancelled and appropriate alternative examination arrangements made which may include rescheduling the examination. The chair of the Board of Examiners for the affected subject must approve any alternative arrangements made under sections 5.
Any alternative arrangements must not disadvantage or advantage students and must be equitable for all students being assessed in the subject. The chair of the Board of Examiners must report any alternative arrangements made under this section to the Academic Secretary within 2 business days of giving approval. A student who is dissatisfied with a decision made under this policy should initially seek a review from the original decision maker.
A student who is dissatisfied with the outcome of the review may lodge a request for a further review of the decision with the Principal Advisor, Student Grievances and Complaints in accordance with the Student Complaints and Grievances Policy , in accordance with the provisions and limitations of that policy. A student who is dissatisfied with the outcome of the review may lodge an appeal with the Academic Secretary in accordance with the Student Appeals Policy. The Student Appeal Panel may decide any dispute or question arising under this policy other than any decision limited by the provisions of part 10 of the Academic Board Regulation. Dean, Associate Dean, course co-ordinator, program director, or academic staff member authorised by the dean to act.
Determine the processes for University-wide special consideration applications and requests for assessment adjustments. Must be consistent with this policy. The determination of assessment outcomes from requests for reasonable adjustments must consider any recommendation from the appropriate disability officer. Determine the timing of a special assessment task if outside the timeframe at 4. This means that the dean may allow a special assessment task to be undertaken after the commencement of the next standard teaching period. The dean may at their own discretion decide a different timeframe.
Students cannot request a change. Development, implementation and publication of guidelines for assessment of special consideration applications. Development, implementation and publication of guidelines for assessment of requests for assessment adjustments. Design, prepare, administer, manage and supervise all components of assessment other than centrally scheduled, formal, supervised written examinations. Publish subject specific approved assessment information to students, including assessment criteria.
Ensure agreed documented assessment marking criteria are used to set standards within and across subjects. Dean of the relevant faculty or an associate dean research training or equivalent authorised by the dean. Provide the Academic Registrar with a copy of the examination paper s by the date set by Academic Registrar;. Be present at the primary examination venue during the reading time in order to respond to student queries and answer any questions from examination supervisors regarding authorised materials; and. Only within 3 months of release and where the student has not graduated. Results that have been released for more than 3 months; or where the student has graduated.
A component may be a single task eg. Only failed assessment tasks need to be double marked. It will usually take the same form as the original assessment task. Preparation may include scheduled practice sessions, preparation time for some assessment tasks, e. When determining the due date of an end of semester assessment task, the swot vac period should not be included when calculating the time needed to complete an assessment task. Insertion of section 4. Consequential renumbering of section 4. Corrections at sections 4. Editorial amendment to 4. Insertion of new sections 4. Addition of explicit examination rules related to online examinations. Amendment to the composition of the Board of Examiners in line with current practice.
Amendments to examination of coursework theses section. At Blinn, that journey includes dedicated faculty and staff who are committed to your success, whether you are pursuing academic transfer to a four-year university or seek career and technical credentials on your way to a rewarding career. Blinn offers stimulating classes, state-of-the-art-technology, hands-on learning opportunities, and professors who have dedicated their careers to providing their students with personalized instruction.
Outside the classroom, the Blinn Library, Writing Center, Learning Center, and computer labs provide a wide range of services to supplement your classroom experience. Blinn also offers a variety of extracurricular opportunities, including student clubs and organizations, music and theatre arts, and even intramurals and athletics. As you can see, Blinn is a vibrant community committed to helping you reach your goals. This catalog describes a flexible program of the curricula, educational plans, offerings, and requirements that may be altered to carry out the purposes and objectives of the College. The provisions of this catalog do not constitute an offer for a contract which may be accepted by students through registration and enrollment in the College.
The College further reserves the right to require a student to withdraw from the College for cause at any time. Copies of this publication have been deposited with the Texas State Library in compliance with the State Depository Law. Select a Catalog Catalog Vol. We encourage you to visit our website at www. Back to Top Print-Friendly Page opens a new window. Blinn College. Telephone Directory. Throwing the blame around for petty things will lead to a losing appeal.
Sometimes tutors can mark your coursework incorrectly and give you misleading feedback on your work. Try not to point the finger at everyone you ever met and instead focus on the specific people who have had a direct impact on your results or situation. Get their names and note down how their actions have affected you. Keep all e-mails or letters between you and the university throughout the entire duration of your course — you never know when you're going to need them as evidence that an event took place e. Don't lose your self-respect by writing an aggressively worded letter. Keep it polite and courteous. You can achieve this by staying positive and, if it helps, pretend that you're writing the appeal for someone else.
If things start to get too personal then take a break and come back later. The panel considering your appeal are like a jury in court and it's your job to win their votes. Your appeal should be clear, consistent, factual, and professional. The university or college needs to know that you're a person of integrity and are serious about your education. Planning what you want to happen if your appeal is successful is just as important as the reasons for appealing.
The appeals panel will be interested in knowing what you're considering doing next if they decide in your favour. Don't ask for an increase to your exam mark or degree classification — it almost never happens. What is an appeal? Here are some examples that we often see: being made to withdraw from a course due to plagiarism given a lower or totally different qualification to what was expected not being allowed to retake an exam that you failed Sometimes it can be a combination of things that you're unhappy about and you can dispute all of them in an appeal if you wish.
The first step Start looking into your institution's appeals and complaints procedures as early in the year as possible. Having a reason to appeal Having good, sound reasons for appealing are known as having grounds for appeal. The most common and accepted grounds for appealing are: You suffered extenuating circumstances during your course or assessment which couldn't be prevented you didn't previously tell the university about affected your ability to perform as you normally would There is evidence of a 'material irregularity' basically an administrative error during the course or in an assessment. This error should be big enough to create a doubt about whether the institution's decision would have been different if the error hadn't happened in the first place There was bias, prejudice, or lack of proper assessment by the examiners who marked your work Let's see what each of these mean and how you could make a claim under each of them.
Extenuating and mitigating circumstances An extenuating circumstance sometimes called a mitigating circumstance is where you've had something happen in your life that has affected your academic performance. Here are some weak excuses given by students for not submitting ECs on time: They didn't know about the institution's procedures and deadlines for submitting ECs They were too embarrassed to do so They feared being discriminated or stigmatised against They forgot to do it They felt it wasn't necessary to claim ECs at the time of assessment because the coursework or exam seemed to go well The cause for not letting the university know about your ECs prior to you appeal needs to be something significant and something that can't be questioned.
Some valid reasons for not submitting ECs on time include: Long periods of hospital stay or frequent hospital visits Inability to communicate with the University Difficulty getting a doctor's note Being a victim of serious crime Bereavement Depression Just to clarify there are two distinctive things taking place: You're informing the university about what your ECs are or were You're giving them a valid reason for not submitting them on time If weren't mentally or physically fit to complete your coursework or sit an exam then you must mention it in your appeal.
Administrative errors When an institution makes a mistake that impacts on your achievements, it's known as an administrative error or material irregularity. The following list show examples of administrative errors you may face: Disruption to normal university services caused by campus maintenance such as building works and relocations which directly impacted on your performance at assessment time Frequent absences of staff members or important staff leaving, and failure of the institution to make adequate provisions to cover this within a reasonable amount of time Failure by the university to provide a satisfactory level of teaching and learning support Incorrect calculation of marks Loss of a piece of coursework Miscommunication of assessment requirements e.
Bias, prejudice, or lack of proper assessment by the examiners It goes without saying that the people who mark your work shouldn't have any bias or prejudice against you. Examples of this could include: The examiner s is previously known to you The examiner s has served as a lecturer or personal tutor and has expressed an opinion concerning the outcome or grade of your work The examiner or a member of their family has an interest in the outcome of your work If you feel any of the above to be true then mention it in your appeal with the reasons and facts behind why you believe such bias or prejudice existed, or still exists. Finding help and assistance We know making an appeal can be stressful and tiresome, especially when you're dealing with it alone.
Gathering evidence " It's not what you know, it's what you can prove " is a quote worth remembering. Here are some examples of evidence you could provide for each ground: Evidence of extenuating circumstances Doctor GP or hospital letter Solicitor's letter Death certificate Medical certificate Court letter or Police letter In the case of a doctor's letter, ensure it states that your condition will have had a considerable effect on your performance. Evidence of material irregularity or administrative error Due to the variety of administrative errors that occur, its your choice what evidence you wish to provide to back up your allegations. These may include: Witness statements Photographs and video clips Dates and times of staff absences available from HR Dates, times and location of disturbances such as building work Coursework acknowledgment slips to prove you submitted your work correctly Assignment instructions with erroneous information Screenshots from online learning resources e.
Blackboard E-mails Evidence of bias, prejudice, or lack of proper assessment This can be a tough one because simply speculating that the examiners acted unfairly is not enough, you actually have to prove it. Evidence can be in the form of: Witness statements Photographs and video clips E-mails Published comments made by an examiner showing bias or favouritism or incompetence. Try looking at social media accounts and media publications they may be involved in including the comments reply sections. Composing the appeal letter This section deals with helping you learn how to write your appeal and structure it logically. Get into the right state of mind Writing an appeal requires a rational state of mind above anything else.
Do it yourself Write your own appeal. Only mention what needs to be mentioned As we've seen, the reasons for appealing vary widely. Resist blaming everyone you know When you're in the state for blaming others, it often ends up being your word against theirs. Never compromise your integrity Don't lose your self-respect by writing an aggressively worded letter. Consider what you want Planning what you want to happen if your appeal is successful is just as important as the reasons for appealing.
A step-by-step structure of an appeal letter Write your name, student number, and contact address. Date the letter. Insert automatic page numbering any word processing software will allow you to insert page numbers. Write the name and address of the department that handles appeals and the name of the person who deals with appeals. If no name is known, then simply write "to whom it may concern". Mention the name and qualification aim of the course you're studying e. BSc Biological Sciences. Introduce yourself to the reader by stating your name and mention why you're writing to them to appeal a decision.
Begin by writing what decision s you're appealing e. Explain each reason for your appeal, starting with the most significant e. Make references to your evidence so that the reader knows what to look at to appreciate the legitimacy of your claim. Don't jump from one reason to another in the middle of a paragraph.Archived from the original on 20 January Academic Appeal Where was Isaac Newton buried? meeting dates Dates for are being agreed and will appear here once confirmed. Eligibility assessments for special consideration Writing a persuasive speech gcse decided by the Writing a persuasive speech gcse Online shopping vs in store shopping term paper. Copies of this publication have been deposited with What are some facts about Fisher College? Texas State Library in compliance with the State Depository Law.